In cases whether other organizations are stakeholders in the decision process (e.g., other government ministries, MUSH sector stakeholders, etc.), the platform can enable stakeholder access to selected information as may be required to obtain feedback, determine priorities, or gather additional perspectives that may be relevant to the decision process.
Search
Pages
- docs.futureInnovate.net
- futureInnovate / futureDecide™ Frequently-Asked Questions / Questions fréquentes
- futureDecide™ Client Documentation
- 1. What is the futureDecide™ platform (ERDP)?
- 2. A quick tour: interfaces and dashboards
- 3. futureDecide™ / ERDP Architecture
- 4. futureDecide™ / ERDP Platform/Service Features
- 5. futureDecide™ / ERDP Project Workflow Overview
- 6. ProGrid® Decision Methodology
- 7. Performance and Value Measurement
- 7.1 Background
- 7.2 Decision Continuum Example: Pilot Project Funding
- 7.3 Underlying Information Architecture
- 7.4 Sample Pilot Project Performance / Value Framework
- 7.5 Measuring performance versus value
- 7.6 Why value streams?
- 7.7 Modelling / visualizing value streams
- 7.8 Innovation Transactions and Value Streams
- 7.9 Value streams versus performance metrics/ scorecards
- 7.10 Modelling Lifecycle Value Stream Impacts: Environmental Example
- 8. futureDecide™ / ERDP Online Applications / Proposals
- 9. futureDecide™ / ERDP Online Reviews
- 10. futureDecide™ / ERDP Decision Support
- 11. futureDecide™ / ERDP Reporting and Notifications
- 12. For Program Admins (requires login)
- 12.1 ProgramAdmin Dashboard Overview
- 12.2 Statistics Menu
- 12.3 Proposal (entity) Menu
- 12.4 Reviewer / Admins Menu
- 12.5 Review Management and Status Menu
- 12.6 Reporting Menu
- 12.7 Decision Management and Notifications Menu
- 12.8 Admin Utilities
- 12.9 MetaEntity Menu (optional)
- 12.10 ProgramAdmin Feature Suggestions