{"id":235,"date":"2010-07-28T23:24:41","date_gmt":"2010-07-29T03:24:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/?page_id=235"},"modified":"2011-02-22T21:30:30","modified_gmt":"2011-02-23T02:30:30","slug":"6-3-key-features-of-the-progrid%c2%ae-methodology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/?page_id=235","title":{"rendered":"6.3 Key features of the ProGrid\u00ae methodology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u2022 The use of an Evaluation Matrix\u2122 as a framework for decision criteria<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The use of Language Ladders\u2122 as a clear and concise method to define individual criteria for decision-making purposes<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\tA unique algorithm for combining the Language Ladder\u2122 rankings of experts or peer reviewers involved in evaluating projects or proposals against the decision criteria<\/p>\n<p>\u2022\tThe use of high-impact visualization to depict in graphical form how projects or proposals compare with each other based on the composite evaluations of experts or peer reviewers<\/p>\n<p>See sample documents following in Sections 6.4 and 6.5<\/p>\n<p>For additional details about the ProGrid\u00ae methodology, please refer to:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/progrid.info\/\">http:\/\/progrid.info<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <em>Intangibles: Exploring the Full Depth of Issues<\/em>, by C.W. Bowman, published in 2005.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/intangibles4.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-236\" title=\"Intangibles\" src=\"http:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/intangibles4.jpg\" alt=\"Intangibles\" width=\"100\" height=\"160\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/?page_id=239\" target=\"_self\">Next<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u2022 The use of an Evaluation Matrix\u2122 as a framework for decision criteria \u2022 The use of Language Ladders\u2122 as a clear and concise method to define individual criteria for decision-making purposes \u2022 A unique algorithm for combining the Language Ladder\u2122 rankings of experts or peer reviewers involved in evaluating projects or proposals against the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":222,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-235","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=235"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2334,"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/235\/revisions\/2334"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/docs.futureinnovate.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}